How about the following headline that appeared on CNN on March 14th: the headline, with the red border, delivers the message that Hillary Clinton is misleading the public. Yes, it says "accused", and it has "misleading public" between quotes implying that someone said it. But by reading this title alone - and many people just browse by the headlines - the message is that Hillary is misleading the public. 
However, once I clicked on that headline, here is what I got:

The difference between the two titles is quite clear. Here is my question: why didn't the editor of CNN's main page use the correct headline: "Obama backer takes aim at Clinton's experience"? Was that editor trying to convey his personal political inclination in that main page headline? Or was it just poor judgement? Either way, unacceptable for someone in that position.